Q1. Which revision most effectively improves clarity and precision?
The argument is kind of weak and not good.
The argument is weak because reasons are missing.
The argument lacks sufficient substantiation to sustain its claims.
The argument isn’t strong enough.
Q2. Which sentence best strengthens cohesion across an analytical paragraph?
This is another point.
Also, this matters.
This reinforces the previous claim by extending its implications.
This is important again.
Q3. Read the paragraph below. Text A frames technological progress as inevitable, emphasising efficiency and innovation, while Text B adopts a more cautious stance, foregrounding ethical concerns and social consequences. Although both texts address the same issue, their differing assumptions about progress shape how evidence is selected and presented. As a result, readers are positioned to either accept rapid advancement as necessary or question its broader implications. What is the reader required to do here?
Identify literal details
Compare perspectives and assumptions
Summarise one text
Identify a visual technique
Q4. Read the paragraph below. In evaluating the evidence presented, the author prioritises anecdotal success stories while largely omitting broader statistical data. This imbalance subtly shifts reader focus away from measurable outcomes toward emotionally resonant examples, increasing persuasive appeal while reducing analytical transparency. What weakness is being identified?
Lack of structure
Overuse of technical language
Biased selection of evidence
Incorrect grammar
Q5. Which sentence correctly uses a semicolon?
The study failed; because the data was incomplete.
The study failed; the data was incomplete.
The study failed; and the data was incomplete.
The study failed,; the data was incomplete.
Q6. Which sentence correctly integrates a quotation?
The author states “change is inevitable”.
The author states, “change is inevitable.”
The author states “change is inevitable.”
The author states, change is inevitable.ss
Q7. Which sentence demonstrates mature exam-style control?
This shows things went bad.
This proves the idea is wrong.
This highlights structural weaknesses within the argument.